# Understanding a Python List | Separate 0 and 1 in a list of arrays

Arrays | Python Methods and Functions | sep | String Variables

Examples:

` Input: arr = [0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0] Output: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] `

We have a solution for this problem, please refer to split 0 and 1 in link per array . We can quickly fix this problem in Python using

` # Function for separating 0 and 1 in a list of arrays `

` def ` ` segregate (arr): `

` res ` ` = ` ` ([x ` ` for ` ` x ` ` in ` ` arr ` ` if ` ` x ` ` = ` ` = ` ` 0 ` `] ` ` + ` ` [x ` ` for x in arr if x = = 1 ]) `

``` print (res)   # Driver program if __ name__ = = "__ main__" : arr = [ 0 , 1 , 0 , 1 , 0 , 0 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 0 ]    segregate (arr) Output: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1] (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); ```
``` ```
``` ```
``` `````` Understanding a Python List | Separate 0 and 1 in a list of arrays: StackOverflow Questions How to print number with commas as thousands separators? I am trying to print an integer in Python 2.6.1 with commas as thousands separators. For example, I want to show the number 1234567 as 1,234,567. How would I go about doing this? I have seen many examples on Google, but I am looking for the simplest practical way. It does not need to be locale-specific to decide between periods and commas. I would prefer something as simple as reasonably possible. How would you make a comma-separated string from a list of strings? Question by mweerden What would be your preferred way to concatenate strings from a sequence such that between every two consecutive pairs a comma is added. That is, how do you map, for instance, ["a", "b", "c"] to "a,b,c"? (The cases ["s"] and [] should be mapped to "s" and "", respectively.) I usually end up using something like "".join(map(lambda x: x+",",l))[:-1], but also feeling somewhat unsatisfied. Separation of business logic and data access in django I am writing a project in Django and I see that 80% of the code is in the file models.py. This code is confusing and, after a certain time, I cease to understand what is really happening. Here is what bothers me: I find it ugly that my model level (which was supposed to be responsible only for the work with data from a database) is also sending email, walking on API to other services, etc. Also, I find it unacceptable to place business logic in the view, because this way it becomes difficult to control. For example, in my application there are at least three ways to create new instances of User, but technically it should create them uniformly. I do not always notice when the methods and properties of my models become non-deterministic and when they develop side effects. Here is a simple example. At first, the User model was like this: class User(db.Models): def get_present_name(self): return self.name or "Anonymous" def activate(self): self.status = "activated" self.save() Over time, it turned into this: class User(db.Models): def get_present_name(self): # property became non-deterministic in terms of database # data is taken from another service by api return remote_api.request_user_name(self.uid) or "Anonymous" def activate(self): # method now has a side effect (send message to user) self.status = "activated" self.save() send_mail("Your account is activated!", "‚Ä¶", [self.email]) What I want is to separate entities in my code: Entities of my database, persistence level: What data does my application keep? Entities of my application, business logic level: What does my application do? What are the good practices to implement such an approach that can be applied in Django? Extracting just Month and Year separately from Pandas Datetime column I have a Dataframe, df, with the following column: df["ArrivalDate"] = ... 936 2012-12-31 938 2012-12-29 965 2012-12-31 966 2012-12-31 967 2012-12-31 968 2012-12-31 969 2012-12-31 970 2012-12-29 971 2012-12-31 972 2012-12-29 973 2012-12-29 ... The elements of the column are pandas.tslib.Timestamp. I want to just include the year and month. I thought there would be simple way to do it, but I can"t figure it out. Here"s what I"ve tried: df["ArrivalDate"].resample("M", how = "mean") I got the following error: Only valid with DatetimeIndex or PeriodIndex Then I tried: df["ArrivalDate"].apply(lambda(x):x[:-2]) I got the following error: "Timestamp" object has no attribute "__getitem__" Any suggestions? Edit: I sort of figured it out. df.index = df["ArrivalDate"] Then, I can resample another column using the index. But I"d still like a method for reconfiguring the entire column. Any ideas? In Python, how do I split a string and keep the separators? Here"s the simplest way to explain this. Here"s what I"m using: re.split("W", "foo/bar spam eggs") -> ["foo", "bar", "spam", "eggs"] Here"s what I want: someMethod("W", "foo/bar spam eggs") -> ["foo", "/", "bar", " ", "spam", " ", "eggs"] The reason is that I want to split a string into tokens, manipulate it, then put it back together again. Split (explode) pandas dataframe string entry to separate rows I have a pandas dataframe in which one column of text strings contains comma-separated values. I want to split each CSV field and create a new row per entry (assume that CSV are clean and need only be split on ","). For example, a should become b: In [7]: a Out[7]: var1 var2 0 a,b,c 1 1 d,e,f 2 In [8]: b Out[8]: var1 var2 0 a 1 1 b 1 2 c 1 3 d 2 4 e 2 5 f 2 So far, I have tried various simple functions, but the .apply method seems to only accept one row as return value when it is used on an axis, and I can"t get .transform to work. Any suggestions would be much appreciated! Example data: from pandas import DataFrame import numpy as np a = DataFrame([{"var1": "a,b,c", "var2": 1}, {"var1": "d,e,f", "var2": 2}]) b = DataFrame([{"var1": "a", "var2": 1}, {"var1": "b", "var2": 1}, {"var1": "c", "var2": 1}, {"var1": "d", "var2": 2}, {"var1": "e", "var2": 2}, {"var1": "f", "var2": 2}]) I know this won"t work because we lose DataFrame meta-data by going through numpy, but it should give you a sense of what I tried to do: def fun(row): letters = row["var1"] letters = letters.split(",") out = np.array([row] * len(letters)) out["var1"] = letters a["idx"] = range(a.shape[0]) z = a.groupby("idx") z.transform(fun) Simpler way to create dictionary of separate variables? I would like to be able to get the name of a variable as a string but I don"t know if Python has that much introspection capabilities. Something like: >>> print(my_var.__name__) "my_var" I want to do that because I have a bunch of variables I"d like to turn into a dictionary like : bar = True foo = False >>> my_dict = dict(bar=bar, foo=foo) >>> print my_dict {"foo": False, "bar": True} But I"d like something more automatic than that. Python have locals() and vars(), so I guess there is a way. Split / Explode a column of dictionaries into separate columns with pandas I have data saved in a postgreSQL database. I am querying this data using Python2.7 and turning it into a Pandas DataFrame. However, the last column of this dataframe has a dictionary of values inside it. The DataFrame df looks like this: Station ID Pollutants 8809 {"a": "46", "b": "3", "c": "12"} 8810 {"a": "36", "b": "5", "c": "8"} 8811 {"b": "2", "c": "7"} 8812 {"c": "11"} 8813 {"a": "82", "c": "15"} I need to split this column into separate columns, so that the DataFrame `df2 looks like this: Station ID a b c 8809 46 3 12 8810 36 5 8 8811 NaN 2 7 8812 NaN NaN 11 8813 82 NaN 15 The major issue I"m having is that the lists are not the same lengths. But all of the lists only contain up to the same 3 values: "a", "b", and "c". And they always appear in the same order ("a" first, "b" second, "c" third). The following code USED to work and return exactly what I wanted (df2). objs = [df, pandas.DataFrame(df["Pollutant Levels"].tolist()).iloc[:, :3]] df2 = pandas.concat(objs, axis=1).drop("Pollutant Levels", axis=1) print(df2) I was running this code just last week and it was working fine. But now my code is broken and I get this error from line [4]: IndexError: out-of-bounds on slice (end) I made no changes to the code but am now getting the error. I feel this is due to my method not being robust or proper. Any suggestions or guidance on how to split this column of lists into separate columns would be super appreciated! EDIT: I think the .tolist() and .apply methods are not working on my code because it is one Unicode string, i.e.: #My data format u{"a": "1", "b": "2", "c": "3"} #and not {u"a": "1", u"b": "2", u"c": "3"} The data is imported from the postgreSQL database in this format. Any help or ideas with this issue? is there a way to convert the Unicode? How to use "/" (directory separator) in both Linux and Windows in Python? I have written a code in python which uses / to make a particular file in a folder, if I want to use the code in windows it will not work, is there a way by which I can use the code in Windows and Linux. In python I am using this code: pathfile=os.path.dirname(templateFile) rootTree.write(""+pathfile+"/output/log.txt") When I will use my code in suppose windows machine my code will not work. How do I use "/" (directory separator) in both Linux and Windows? How can I plot separate Pandas DataFrames as subplots? I have a few Pandas DataFrames sharing the same value scale, but having different columns and indices. When invoking df.plot(), I get separate plot images. what I really want is to have them all in the same plot as subplots, but I"m unfortunately failing to come up with a solution to how and would highly appreciate some help. Answer #1 Recommendation for beginners: This is my personal recommendation for beginners: start by learning virtualenv and pip, tools which work with both Python 2 and 3 and in a variety of situations, and pick up other tools once you start needing them. PyPI packages not in the standard library: virtualenv is a very popular tool that creates isolated Python environments for Python libraries. If you"re not familiar with this tool, I highly recommend learning it, as it is a very useful tool, and I"ll be making comparisons to it for the rest of this answer. It works by installing a bunch of files in a directory (eg: env/), and then modifying the PATH environment variable to prefix it with a custom bin directory (eg: env/bin/). An exact copy of the python or python3 binary is placed in this directory, but Python is programmed to look for libraries relative to its path first, in the environment directory. It"s not part of Python"s standard library, but is officially blessed by the PyPA (Python Packaging Authority). Once activated, you can install packages in the virtual environment using pip. pyenv is used to isolate Python versions. For example, you may want to test your code against Python 2.7, 3.6, 3.7 and 3.8, so you"ll need a way to switch between them. Once activated, it prefixes the PATH environment variable with ~/.pyenv/shims, where there are special files matching the Python commands (python, pip). These are not copies of the Python-shipped commands; they are special scripts that decide on the fly which version of Python to run based on the PYENV_VERSION environment variable, or the .python-version file, or the ~/.pyenv/version file. pyenv also makes the process of downloading and installing multiple Python versions easier, using the command pyenv install. pyenv-virtualenv is a plugin for pyenv by the same author as pyenv, to allow you to use pyenv and virtualenv at the same time conveniently. However, if you"re using Python 3.3 or later, pyenv-virtualenv will try to run python -m venv if it is available, instead of virtualenv. You can use virtualenv and pyenv together without pyenv-virtualenv, if you don"t want the convenience features. virtualenvwrapper is a set of extensions to virtualenv (see docs). It gives you commands like mkvirtualenv, lssitepackages, and especially workon for switching between different virtualenv directories. This tool is especially useful if you want multiple virtualenv directories. pyenv-virtualenvwrapper is a plugin for pyenv by the same author as pyenv, to conveniently integrate virtualenvwrapper into pyenv. pipenv aims to combine Pipfile, pip and virtualenv into one command on the command-line. The virtualenv directory typically gets placed in ~/.local/share/virtualenvs/XXX, with XXX being a hash of the path of the project directory. This is different from virtualenv, where the directory is typically in the current working directory. pipenv is meant to be used when developing Python applications (as opposed to libraries). There are alternatives to pipenv, such as poetry, which I won"t list here since this question is only about the packages that are similarly named. Standard library: pyvenv (not to be confused with pyenv in the previous section) is a script shipped with Python 3 but deprecated in Python 3.6 as it had problems (not to mention the confusing name). In Python 3.6+, the exact equivalent is python3 -m venv. venv is a package shipped with Python 3, which you can run using python3 -m venv (although for some reason some distros separate it out into a separate distro package, such as python3-venv on Ubuntu/Debian). It serves the same purpose as virtualenv, but only has a subset of its features (see a comparison here). virtualenv continues to be more popular than venv, especially since the former supports both Python 2 and 3. Answer #2 In Python, what is the purpose of __slots__ and what are the cases one should avoid this? TLDR: The special attribute __slots__ allows you to explicitly state which instance attributes you expect your object instances to have, with the expected results: faster attribute access. space savings in memory. The space savings is from Storing value references in slots instead of __dict__. Denying __dict__ and __weakref__ creation if parent classes deny them and you declare __slots__. Quick Caveats Small caveat, you should only declare a particular slot one time in an inheritance tree. For example: class Base: __slots__ = "foo", "bar" class Right(Base): __slots__ = "baz", class Wrong(Base): __slots__ = "foo", "bar", "baz" # redundant foo and bar Python doesn"t object when you get this wrong (it probably should), problems might not otherwise manifest, but your objects will take up more space than they otherwise should. Python 3.8: >>> from sys import getsizeof >>> getsizeof(Right()), getsizeof(Wrong()) (56, 72) This is because the Base"s slot descriptor has a slot separate from the Wrong"s. This shouldn"t usually come up, but it could: >>> w = Wrong() >>> w.foo = "foo" >>> Base.foo.__get__(w) Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> AttributeError: foo >>> Wrong.foo.__get__(w) "foo" The biggest caveat is for multiple inheritance - multiple "parent classes with nonempty slots" cannot be combined. To accommodate this restriction, follow best practices: Factor out all but one or all parents" abstraction which their concrete class respectively and your new concrete class collectively will inherit from - giving the abstraction(s) empty slots (just like abstract base classes in the standard library). See section on multiple inheritance below for an example. Requirements: To have attributes named in __slots__ to actually be stored in slots instead of a __dict__, a class must inherit from object (automatic in Python 3, but must be explicit in Python 2). To prevent the creation of a __dict__, you must inherit from object and all classes in the inheritance must declare __slots__ and none of them can have a "__dict__" entry. There are a lot of details if you wish to keep reading. Why use __slots__: Faster attribute access. The creator of Python, Guido van Rossum, states that he actually created __slots__ for faster attribute access. It is trivial to demonstrate measurably significant faster access: import timeit class Foo(object): __slots__ = "foo", class Bar(object): pass slotted = Foo() not_slotted = Bar() def get_set_delete_fn(obj): def get_set_delete(): obj.foo = "foo" obj.foo del obj.foo return get_set_delete and >>> min(timeit.repeat(get_set_delete_fn(slotted))) 0.2846834529991611 >>> min(timeit.repeat(get_set_delete_fn(not_slotted))) 0.3664822799983085 The slotted access is almost 30% faster in Python 3.5 on Ubuntu. >>> 0.3664822799983085 / 0.2846834529991611 1.2873325658284342 In Python 2 on Windows I have measured it about 15% faster. Why use __slots__: Memory Savings Another purpose of __slots__ is to reduce the space in memory that each object instance takes up. My own contribution to the documentation clearly states the reasons behind this: The space saved over using __dict__ can be significant. SQLAlchemy attributes a lot of memory savings to __slots__. To verify this, using the Anaconda distribution of Python 2.7 on Ubuntu Linux, with guppy.hpy (aka heapy) and sys.getsizeof, the size of a class instance without __slots__ declared, and nothing else, is 64 bytes. That does not include the __dict__. Thank you Python for lazy evaluation again, the __dict__ is apparently not called into existence until it is referenced, but classes without data are usually useless. When called into existence, the __dict__ attribute is a minimum of 280 bytes additionally. In contrast, a class instance with __slots__ declared to be () (no data) is only 16 bytes, and 56 total bytes with one item in slots, 64 with two. For 64 bit Python, I illustrate the memory consumption in bytes in Python 2.7 and 3.6, for __slots__ and __dict__ (no slots defined) for each point where the dict grows in 3.6 (except for 0, 1, and 2 attributes): Python 2.7 Python 3.6 attrs __slots__ __dict__* __slots__ __dict__* | *(no slots defined) none 16 56 + 272‚Ä† 16 56 + 112‚Ä† | ‚Ä†if __dict__ referenced one 48 56 + 272 48 56 + 112 two 56 56 + 272 56 56 + 112 six 88 56 + 1040 88 56 + 152 11 128 56 + 1040 128 56 + 240 22 216 56 + 3344 216 56 + 408 43 384 56 + 3344 384 56 + 752 So, in spite of smaller dicts in Python 3, we see how nicely __slots__ scale for instances to save us memory, and that is a major reason you would want to use __slots__. Just for completeness of my notes, note that there is a one-time cost per slot in the class"s namespace of 64 bytes in Python 2, and 72 bytes in Python 3, because slots use data descriptors like properties, called "members". >>> Foo.foo <member "foo" of "Foo" objects> >>> type(Foo.foo) <class "member_descriptor"> >>> getsizeof(Foo.foo) 72 Demonstration of __slots__: To deny the creation of a __dict__, you must subclass object. Everything subclasses object in Python 3, but in Python 2 you had to be explicit: class Base(object): __slots__ = () now: >>> b = Base() >>> b.a = "a" Traceback (most recent call last): File "<pyshell#38>", line 1, in <module> b.a = "a" AttributeError: "Base" object has no attribute "a" Or subclass another class that defines __slots__ class Child(Base): __slots__ = ("a",) and now: c = Child() c.a = "a" but: >>> c.b = "b" Traceback (most recent call last): File "<pyshell#42>", line 1, in <module> c.b = "b" AttributeError: "Child" object has no attribute "b" To allow __dict__ creation while subclassing slotted objects, just add "__dict__" to the __slots__ (note that slots are ordered, and you shouldn"t repeat slots that are already in parent classes): class SlottedWithDict(Child): __slots__ = ("__dict__", "b") swd = SlottedWithDict() swd.a = "a" swd.b = "b" swd.c = "c" and >>> swd.__dict__ {"c": "c"} Or you don"t even need to declare __slots__ in your subclass, and you will still use slots from the parents, but not restrict the creation of a __dict__: class NoSlots(Child): pass ns = NoSlots() ns.a = "a" ns.b = "b" And: >>> ns.__dict__ {"b": "b"} However, __slots__ may cause problems for multiple inheritance: class BaseA(object): __slots__ = ("a",) class BaseB(object): __slots__ = ("b",) Because creating a child class from parents with both non-empty slots fails: >>> class Child(BaseA, BaseB): __slots__ = () Traceback (most recent call last): File "<pyshell#68>", line 1, in <module> class Child(BaseA, BaseB): __slots__ = () TypeError: Error when calling the metaclass bases multiple bases have instance lay-out conflict If you run into this problem, You could just remove __slots__ from the parents, or if you have control of the parents, give them empty slots, or refactor to abstractions: from abc import ABC class AbstractA(ABC): __slots__ = () class BaseA(AbstractA): __slots__ = ("a",) class AbstractB(ABC): __slots__ = () class BaseB(AbstractB): __slots__ = ("b",) class Child(AbstractA, AbstractB): __slots__ = ("a", "b") c = Child() # no problem! Add "__dict__" to __slots__ to get dynamic assignment: class Foo(object): __slots__ = "bar", "baz", "__dict__" and now: >>> foo = Foo() >>> foo.boink = "boink" So with "__dict__" in slots we lose some of the size benefits with the upside of having dynamic assignment and still having slots for the names we do expect. When you inherit from an object that isn"t slotted, you get the same sort of semantics when you use __slots__ - names that are in __slots__ point to slotted values, while any other values are put in the instance"s __dict__. Avoiding __slots__ because you want to be able to add attributes on the fly is actually not a good reason - just add "__dict__" to your __slots__ if this is required. You can similarly add __weakref__ to __slots__ explicitly if you need that feature. Set to empty tuple when subclassing a namedtuple: The namedtuple builtin make immutable instances that are very lightweight (essentially, the size of tuples) but to get the benefits, you need to do it yourself if you subclass them: from collections import namedtuple class MyNT(namedtuple("MyNT", "bar baz")): """MyNT is an immutable and lightweight object""" __slots__ = () usage: >>> nt = MyNT("bar", "baz") >>> nt.bar "bar" >>> nt.baz "baz" And trying to assign an unexpected attribute raises an AttributeError because we have prevented the creation of __dict__: >>> nt.quux = "quux" Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> AttributeError: "MyNT" object has no attribute "quux" You can allow __dict__ creation by leaving off __slots__ = (), but you can"t use non-empty __slots__ with subtypes of tuple. Biggest Caveat: Multiple inheritance Even when non-empty slots are the same for multiple parents, they cannot be used together: class Foo(object): __slots__ = "foo", "bar" class Bar(object): __slots__ = "foo", "bar" # alas, would work if empty, i.e. () >>> class Baz(Foo, Bar): pass Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> TypeError: Error when calling the metaclass bases multiple bases have instance lay-out conflict Using an empty __slots__ in the parent seems to provide the most flexibility, allowing the child to choose to prevent or allow (by adding "__dict__" to get dynamic assignment, see section above) the creation of a __dict__: class Foo(object): __slots__ = () class Bar(object): __slots__ = () class Baz(Foo, Bar): __slots__ = ("foo", "bar") b = Baz() b.foo, b.bar = "foo", "bar" You don"t have to have slots - so if you add them, and remove them later, it shouldn"t cause any problems. Going out on a limb here: If you"re composing mixins or using abstract base classes, which aren"t intended to be instantiated, an empty __slots__ in those parents seems to be the best way to go in terms of flexibility for subclassers. To demonstrate, first, let"s create a class with code we"d like to use under multiple inheritance class AbstractBase: __slots__ = () def __init__(self, a, b): self.a = a self.b = b def __repr__(self): return f"{type(self).__name__}({repr(self.a)}, {repr(self.b)})" We could use the above directly by inheriting and declaring the expected slots: class Foo(AbstractBase): __slots__ = "a", "b" But we don"t care about that, that"s trivial single inheritance, we need another class we might also inherit from, maybe with a noisy attribute: class AbstractBaseC: __slots__ = () @property def c(self): print("getting c!") return self._c @c.setter def c(self, arg): print("setting c!") self._c = arg Now if both bases had nonempty slots, we couldn"t do the below. (In fact, if we wanted, we could have given AbstractBase nonempty slots a and b, and left them out of the below declaration - leaving them in would be wrong): class Concretion(AbstractBase, AbstractBaseC): __slots__ = "a b _c".split() And now we have functionality from both via multiple inheritance, and can still deny __dict__ and __weakref__ instantiation: >>> c = Concretion("a", "b") >>> c.c = c setting c! >>> c.c getting c! Concretion("a", "b") >>> c.d = "d" Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> AttributeError: "Concretion" object has no attribute "d" Other cases to avoid slots: Avoid them when you want to perform __class__ assignment with another class that doesn"t have them (and you can"t add them) unless the slot layouts are identical. (I am very interested in learning who is doing this and why.) Avoid them if you want to subclass variable length builtins like long, tuple, or str, and you want to add attributes to them. Avoid them if you insist on providing default values via class attributes for instance variables. You may be able to tease out further caveats from the rest of the __slots__ documentation (the 3.7 dev docs are the most current), which I have made significant recent contributions to. Critiques of other answers The current top answers cite outdated information and are quite hand-wavy and miss the mark in some important ways. Do not "only use __slots__ when instantiating lots of objects" I quote: "You would want to use __slots__ if you are going to instantiate a lot (hundreds, thousands) of objects of the same class." Abstract Base Classes, for example, from the collections module, are not instantiated, yet __slots__ are declared for them. Why? If a user wishes to deny __dict__ or __weakref__ creation, those things must not be available in the parent classes. __slots__ contributes to reusability when creating interfaces or mixins. It is true that many Python users aren"t writing for reusability, but when you are, having the option to deny unnecessary space usage is valuable. __slots__ doesn"t break pickling When pickling a slotted object, you may find it complains with a misleading TypeError: >>> pickle.loads(pickle.dumps(f)) TypeError: a class that defines __slots__ without defining __getstate__ cannot be pickled This is actually incorrect. This message comes from the oldest protocol, which is the default. You can select the latest protocol with the -1 argument. In Python 2.7 this would be 2 (which was introduced in 2.3), and in 3.6 it is 4. >>> pickle.loads(pickle.dumps(f, -1)) <__main__.Foo object at 0x1129C770> in Python 2.7: >>> pickle.loads(pickle.dumps(f, 2)) <__main__.Foo object at 0x1129C770> in Python 3.6 >>> pickle.loads(pickle.dumps(f, 4)) <__main__.Foo object at 0x1129C770> So I would keep this in mind, as it is a solved problem. Critique of the (until Oct 2, 2016) accepted answer The first paragraph is half short explanation, half predictive. Here"s the only part that actually answers the question The proper use of __slots__ is to save space in objects. Instead of having a dynamic dict that allows adding attributes to objects at anytime, there is a static structure which does not allow additions after creation. This saves the overhead of one dict for every object that uses slots The second half is wishful thinking, and off the mark: While this is sometimes a useful optimization, it would be completely unnecessary if the Python interpreter was dynamic enough so that it would only require the dict when there actually were additions to the object. Python actually does something similar to this, only creating the __dict__ when it is accessed, but creating lots of objects with no data is fairly ridiculous. The second paragraph oversimplifies and misses actual reasons to avoid __slots__. The below is not a real reason to avoid slots (for actual reasons, see the rest of my answer above.): They change the behavior of the objects that have slots in a way that can be abused by control freaks and static typing weenies. It then goes on to discuss other ways of accomplishing that perverse goal with Python, not discussing anything to do with __slots__. The third paragraph is more wishful thinking. Together it is mostly off-the-mark content that the answerer didn"t even author and contributes to ammunition for critics of the site. Memory usage evidence Create some normal objects and slotted objects: >>> class Foo(object): pass >>> class Bar(object): __slots__ = () Instantiate a million of them: >>> foos = [Foo() for f in xrange(1000000)] >>> bars = [Bar() for b in xrange(1000000)] Inspect with guppy.hpy().heap(): >>> guppy.hpy().heap() Partition of a set of 2028259 objects. Total size = 99763360 bytes. Index Count % Size % Cumulative % Kind (class / dict of class) 0 1000000 49 64000000 64 64000000 64 __main__.Foo 1 169 0 16281480 16 80281480 80 list 2 1000000 49 16000000 16 96281480 97 __main__.Bar 3 12284 1 987472 1 97268952 97 str ... Access the regular objects and their __dict__ and inspect again: >>> for f in foos: ... f.__dict__ >>> guppy.hpy().heap() Partition of a set of 3028258 objects. Total size = 379763480 bytes. Index Count % Size % Cumulative % Kind (class / dict of class) 0 1000000 33 280000000 74 280000000 74 dict of __main__.Foo 1 1000000 33 64000000 17 344000000 91 __main__.Foo 2 169 0 16281480 4 360281480 95 list 3 1000000 33 16000000 4 376281480 99 __main__.Bar 4 12284 0 987472 0 377268952 99 str ... This is consistent with the history of Python, from Unifying types and classes in Python 2.2 If you subclass a built-in type, extra space is automatically added to the instances to accomodate __dict__ and __weakrefs__. (The __dict__ is not initialized until you use it though, so you shouldn"t worry about the space occupied by an empty dictionary for each instance you create.) If you don"t need this extra space, you can add the phrase "__slots__ = []" to your class. Answer #3 os.listdir() - list in the current directory With listdir in os module you get the files and the folders in the current dir import os arr = os.listdir() print(arr) >>> ["\$RECYCLE.BIN", "work.txt", "3ebooks.txt", "documents"] Looking in a directory arr = os.listdir("c:\files") glob from glob with glob you can specify a type of file to list like this import glob txtfiles = [] for file in glob.glob("*.txt"): txtfiles.append(file) glob in a list comprehension mylist = [f for f in glob.glob("*.txt")] get the full path of only files in the current directory import os from os import listdir from os.path import isfile, join cwd = os.getcwd() onlyfiles = [os.path.join(cwd, f) for f in os.listdir(cwd) if os.path.isfile(os.path.join(cwd, f))] print(onlyfiles) ["G:\getfilesname\getfilesname.py", "G:\getfilesname\example.txt"] Getting the full path name with os.path.abspath You get the full path in return import os files_path = [os.path.abspath(x) for x in os.listdir()] print(files_path) ["F:\documentiapplications.txt", "F:\documenticollections.txt"] Walk: going through sub directories os.walk returns the root, the directories list and the files list, that is why I unpacked them in r, d, f in the for loop; it, then, looks for other files and directories in the subfolders of the root and so on until there are no subfolders. import os # Getting the current work directory (cwd) thisdir = os.getcwd() # r=root, d=directories, f = files for r, d, f in os.walk(thisdir): for file in f: if file.endswith(".docx"): print(os.path.join(r, file)) os.listdir(): get files in the current directory (Python 2) In Python 2, if you want the list of the files in the current directory, you have to give the argument as "." or os.getcwd() in the os.listdir method. import os arr = os.listdir(".") print(arr) >>> ["\$RECYCLE.BIN", "work.txt", "3ebooks.txt", "documents"] To go up in the directory tree # Method 1 x = os.listdir("..") # Method 2 x= os.listdir("/") Get files: os.listdir() in a particular directory (Python 2 and 3) import os arr = os.listdir("F:\python") print(arr) >>> ["\$RECYCLE.BIN", "work.txt", "3ebooks.txt", "documents"] Get files of a particular subdirectory with os.listdir() import os x = os.listdir("./content") os.walk(".") - current directory import os arr = next(os.walk("."))[2] print(arr) >>> ["5bs_Turismo1.pdf", "5bs_Turismo1.pptx", "esperienza.txt"] next(os.walk(".")) and os.path.join("dir", "file") import os arr = [] for d,r,f in next(os.walk("F:\_python")): for file in f: arr.append(os.path.join(r,file)) for f in arr: print(files) >>> F:\_python\dict_class.py >>> F:\_python\programmi.txt next(os.walk("F:\") - get the full path - list comprehension [os.path.join(r,file) for r,d,f in next(os.walk("F:\_python")) for file in f] >>> ["F:\_python\dict_class.py", "F:\_python\programmi.txt"] os.walk - get full path - all files in sub dirs** x = [os.path.join(r,file) for r,d,f in os.walk("F:\_python") for file in f] print(x) >>> ["F:\_python\dict.py", "F:\_python\progr.txt", "F:\_python\readl.py"] os.listdir() - get only txt files arr_txt = [x for x in os.listdir() if x.endswith(".txt")] print(arr_txt) >>> ["work.txt", "3ebooks.txt"] Using glob to get the full path of the files If I should need the absolute path of the files: from path import path from glob import glob x = [path(f).abspath() for f in glob("F:\*.txt")] for f in x: print(f) >>> F:acquistionline.txt >>> F:acquisti_2018.txt >>> F:ootstrap_jquery_ecc.txt Using os.path.isfile to avoid directories in the list import os.path listOfFiles = [f for f in os.listdir() if os.path.isfile(f)] print(listOfFiles) >>> ["a simple game.py", "data.txt", "decorator.py"] Using pathlib from Python 3.4 import pathlib flist = [] for p in pathlib.Path(".").iterdir(): if p.is_file(): print(p) flist.append(p) >>> error.PNG >>> exemaker.bat >>> guiprova.mp3 >>> setup.py >>> speak_gui2.py >>> thumb.PNG With list comprehension: flist = [p for p in pathlib.Path(".").iterdir() if p.is_file()] Alternatively, use pathlib.Path() instead of pathlib.Path(".") Use glob method in pathlib.Path() import pathlib py = pathlib.Path().glob("*.py") for file in py: print(file) >>> stack_overflow_list.py >>> stack_overflow_list_tkinter.py Get all and only files with os.walk import os x = [i[2] for i in os.walk(".")] y=[] for t in x: for f in t: y.append(f) print(y) >>> ["append_to_list.py", "data.txt", "data1.txt", "data2.txt", "data_180617", "os_walk.py", "READ2.py", "read_data.py", "somma_defaltdic.py", "substitute_words.py", "sum_data.py", "data.txt", "data1.txt", "data_180617"] Get only files with next and walk in a directory import os x = next(os.walk("F://python"))[2] print(x) >>> ["calculator.bat","calculator.py"] Get only directories with next and walk in a directory import os next(os.walk("F://python"))[1] # for the current dir use (".") >>> ["python3","others"] Get all the subdir names with walk for r,d,f in os.walk("F:\_python"): for dirs in d: print(dirs) >>> .vscode >>> pyexcel >>> pyschool.py >>> subtitles >>> _metaprogramming >>> .ipynb_checkpoints os.scandir() from Python 3.5 and greater import os x = [f.name for f in os.scandir() if f.is_file()] print(x) >>> ["calculator.bat","calculator.py"] # Another example with scandir (a little variation from docs.python.org) # This one is more efficient than os.listdir. # In this case, it shows the files only in the current directory # where the script is executed. import os with os.scandir() as i: for entry in i: if entry.is_file(): print(entry.name) >>> ebookmaker.py >>> error.PNG >>> exemaker.bat >>> guiprova.mp3 >>> setup.py >>> speakgui4.py >>> speak_gui2.py >>> speak_gui3.py >>> thumb.PNG Examples: Ex. 1: How many files are there in the subdirectories? In this example, we look for the number of files that are included in all the directory and its subdirectories. import os def count(dir, counter=0): "returns number of files in dir and subdirs" for pack in os.walk(dir): for f in pack[2]: counter += 1 return dir + " : " + str(counter) + "files" print(count("F:\python")) >>> "F:\python" : 12057 files" Ex.2: How to copy all files from a directory to another? A script to make order in your computer finding all files of a type (default: pptx) and copying them in a new folder. import os import shutil from path import path destination = "F:\file_copied" # os.makedirs(destination) def copyfile(dir, filetype="pptx", counter=0): "Searches for pptx (or other - pptx is the default) files and copies them" for pack in os.walk(dir): for f in pack[2]: if f.endswith(filetype): fullpath = pack[0] + "\" + f print(fullpath) shutil.copy(fullpath, destination) counter += 1 if counter > 0: print("-" * 30) print(" ==> Found in: `" + dir + "` : " + str(counter) + " files ") for dir in os.listdir(): "searches for folders that starts with `_`" if dir[0] == "_": # copyfile(dir, filetype="pdf") copyfile(dir, filetype="txt") >>> _compiti18Compito Contabilit√† 1conti.txt >>> _compiti18Compito Contabilit√† 1modula4.txt >>> _compiti18Compito Contabilit√† 1moduloa4.txt >>> ------------------------ >>> ==> Found in: `_compiti18` : 3 files Ex. 3: How to get all the files in a txt file In case you want to create a txt file with all the file names: import os mylist = "" with open("filelist.txt", "w", encoding="utf-8") as file: for eachfile in os.listdir(): mylist += eachfile + " " file.write(mylist) Example: txt with all the files of an hard drive """ We are going to save a txt file with all the files in your directory. We will use the function walk() """ import os # see all the methods of os # print(*dir(os), sep=", ") listafile = [] percorso = [] with open("lista_file.txt", "w", encoding="utf-8") as testo: for root, dirs, files in os.walk("D:\"): for file in files: listafile.append(file) percorso.append(root + "\" + file) testo.write(file + " ") listafile.sort() print("N. of files", len(listafile)) with open("lista_file_ordinata.txt", "w", encoding="utf-8") as testo_ordinato: for file in listafile: testo_ordinato.write(file + " ") with open("percorso.txt", "w", encoding="utf-8") as file_percorso: for file in percorso: file_percorso.write(file + " ") os.system("lista_file.txt") os.system("lista_file_ordinata.txt") os.system("percorso.txt") All the file of C: in one text file This is a shorter version of the previous code. Change the folder where to start finding the files if you need to start from another position. This code generate a 50 mb on text file on my computer with something less then 500.000 lines with files with the complete path. import os with open("file.txt", "w", encoding="utf-8") as filewrite: for r, d, f in os.walk("C:\"): for file in f: filewrite.write(f"{r + file} ") How to write a file with all paths in a folder of a type With this function you can create a txt file that will have the name of a type of file that you look for (ex. pngfile.txt) with all the full path of all the files of that type. It can be useful sometimes, I think. import os def searchfiles(extension=".ttf", folder="H:\"): "Create a txt file with all the file of a type" with open(extension[1:] + "file.txt", "w", encoding="utf-8") as filewrite: for r, d, f in os.walk(folder): for file in f: if file.endswith(extension): filewrite.write(f"{r + file} ") # looking for png file (fonts) in the hard disk H: searchfiles(".png", "H:\") >>> H:4bs_18Dolphins5.png >>> H:4bs_18Dolphins6.png >>> H:4bs_18Dolphins7.png >>> H:5_18marketing htmlassetsimageslogo2.png >>> H:7z001.png >>> H:7z002.png (New) Find all files and open them with tkinter GUI I just wanted to add in this 2019 a little app to search for all files in a dir and be able to open them by doubleclicking on the name of the file in the list. import tkinter as tk import os def searchfiles(extension=".txt", folder="H:\"): "insert all files in the listbox" for r, d, f in os.walk(folder): for file in f: if file.endswith(extension): lb.insert(0, r + "\" + file) def open_file(): os.startfile(lb.get(lb.curselection()[0])) root = tk.Tk() root.geometry("400x400") bt = tk.Button(root, text="Search", command=lambda:searchfiles(".png", "H:\")) bt.pack() lb = tk.Listbox(root) lb.pack(fill="both", expand=1) lb.bind("<Double-Button>", lambda x: open_file()) root.mainloop() Answer #4 You can disable any Python warnings via the PYTHONWARNINGS environment variable. In this case, you want: export PYTHONWARNINGS="ignore:Unverified HTTPS request" To disable using Python code (requests >= 2.16.0): import urllib3 urllib3.disable_warnings(urllib3.exceptions.InsecureRequestWarning) For requests < 2.16.0, see original answer below. Original answer The reason doing urllib3.disable_warnings() didn"t work for you is because it looks like you"re using a separate instance of urllib3 vendored inside of requests. I gather this based on the path here: /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/requests/packages/urllib3/connectionpool.py To disable warnings in requests" vendored urllib3, you"ll need to import that specific instance of the module: import requests from requests.packages.urllib3.exceptions import InsecureRequestWarning requests.packages.urllib3.disable_warnings(InsecureRequestWarning) Answer #5 Because [] and {} are literal syntax. Python can create bytecode just to create the list or dictionary objects: >>> import dis >>> dis.dis(compile("[]", "", "eval")) 1 0 BUILD_LIST 0 3 RETURN_VALUE >>> dis.dis(compile("{}", "", "eval")) 1 0 BUILD_MAP 0 3 RETURN_VALUE list() and dict() are separate objects. Their names need to be resolved, the stack has to be involved to push the arguments, the frame has to be stored to retrieve later, and a call has to be made. That all takes more time. For the empty case, that means you have at the very least a LOAD_NAME (which has to search through the global namespace as well as the builtins module) followed by a CALL_FUNCTION, which has to preserve the current frame: >>> dis.dis(compile("list()", "", "eval")) 1 0 LOAD_NAME 0 (list) 3 CALL_FUNCTION 0 6 RETURN_VALUE >>> dis.dis(compile("dict()", "", "eval")) 1 0 LOAD_NAME 0 (dict) 3 CALL_FUNCTION 0 6 RETURN_VALUE You can time the name lookup separately with timeit: >>> import timeit >>> timeit.timeit("list", number=10**7) 0.30749011039733887 >>> timeit.timeit("dict", number=10**7) 0.4215109348297119 The time discrepancy there is probably a dictionary hash collision. Subtract those times from the times for calling those objects, and compare the result against the times for using literals: >>> timeit.timeit("[]", number=10**7) 0.30478692054748535 >>> timeit.timeit("{}", number=10**7) 0.31482696533203125 >>> timeit.timeit("list()", number=10**7) 0.9991960525512695 >>> timeit.timeit("dict()", number=10**7) 1.0200958251953125 So having to call the object takes an additional 1.00 - 0.31 - 0.30 == 0.39 seconds per 10 million calls. You can avoid the global lookup cost by aliasing the global names as locals (using a timeit setup, everything you bind to a name is a local): >>> timeit.timeit("_list", "_list = list", number=10**7) 0.1866450309753418 >>> timeit.timeit("_dict", "_dict = dict", number=10**7) 0.19016098976135254 >>> timeit.timeit("_list()", "_list = list", number=10**7) 0.841480016708374 >>> timeit.timeit("_dict()", "_dict = dict", number=10**7) 0.7233691215515137 but you never can overcome that CALL_FUNCTION cost. Answer #6 The datetime module is your friend: import datetime now = datetime.datetime.now() print(now.year, now.month, now.day, now.hour, now.minute, now.second) # 2015 5 6 8 53 40 You don"t need separate variables, the attributes on the returned datetime object have all you need. Answer #7 Are dictionaries ordered in Python 3.6+? They are insertion ordered[1]. As of Python 3.6, for the CPython implementation of Python, dictionaries remember the order of items inserted. This is considered an implementation detail in Python 3.6; you need to use OrderedDict if you want insertion ordering that"s guaranteed across other implementations of Python (and other ordered behavior[1]). As of Python 3.7, this is no longer an implementation detail and instead becomes a language feature. From a python-dev message by GvR: Make it so. "Dict keeps insertion order" is the ruling. Thanks! This simply means that you can depend on it. Other implementations of Python must also offer an insertion ordered dictionary if they wish to be a conforming implementation of Python 3.7. How does the Python 3.6 dictionary implementation perform better[2] than the older one while preserving element order? Essentially, by keeping two arrays. The first array, dk_entries, holds the entries (of type PyDictKeyEntry) for the dictionary in the order that they were inserted. Preserving order is achieved by this being an append only array where new items are always inserted at the end (insertion order). The second, dk_indices, holds the indices for the dk_entries array (that is, values that indicate the position of the corresponding entry in dk_entries). This array acts as the hash table. When a key is hashed it leads to one of the indices stored in dk_indices and the corresponding entry is fetched by indexing dk_entries. Since only indices are kept, the type of this array depends on the overall size of the dictionary (ranging from type int8_t(1 byte) to int32_t/int64_t (4/8 bytes) on 32/64 bit builds) In the previous implementation, a sparse array of type PyDictKeyEntry and size dk_size had to be allocated; unfortunately, it also resulted in a lot of empty space since that array was not allowed to be more than 2/3 * dk_size full for performance reasons. (and the empty space still had PyDictKeyEntry size!). This is not the case now since only the required entries are stored (those that have been inserted) and a sparse array of type intX_t (X depending on dict size) 2/3 * dk_sizes full is kept. The empty space changed from type PyDictKeyEntry to intX_t. So, obviously, creating a sparse array of type PyDictKeyEntry is much more memory demanding than a sparse array for storing ints. You can see the full conversation on Python-Dev regarding this feature if interested, it is a good read. In the original proposal made by Raymond Hettinger, a visualization of the data structures used can be seen which captures the gist of the idea. For example, the dictionary: d = {"timmy": "red", "barry": "green", "guido": "blue"} is currently stored as [keyhash, key, value]: entries = [["--", "--", "--"], [-8522787127447073495, "barry", "green"], ["--", "--", "--"], ["--", "--", "--"], ["--", "--", "--"], [-9092791511155847987, "timmy", "red"], ["--", "--", "--"], [-6480567542315338377, "guido", "blue"]] Instead, the data should be organized as follows: indices = [None, 1, None, None, None, 0, None, 2] entries = [[-9092791511155847987, "timmy", "red"], [-8522787127447073495, "barry", "green"], [-6480567542315338377, "guido", "blue"]] As you can visually now see, in the original proposal, a lot of space is essentially empty to reduce collisions and make look-ups faster. With the new approach, you reduce the memory required by moving the sparseness where it"s really required, in the indices. [1]: I say "insertion ordered" and not "ordered" since, with the existence of OrderedDict, "ordered" suggests further behavior that the `dict` object *doesn"t provide*. OrderedDicts are reversible, provide order sensitive methods and, mainly, provide an order-sensive equality tests (`==`, `!=`). `dict`s currently don"t offer any of those behaviors/methods. [2]: The new dictionary implementations performs better **memory wise** by being designed more compactly; that"s the main benefit here. Speed wise, the difference isn"t so drastic, there"s places where the new dict might introduce slight regressions ([key-lookups, for example][10]) while in others (iteration and resizing come to mind) a performance boost should be present. Overall, the performance of the dictionary, especially in real-life situations, improves due to the compactness introduced. Answer #8 tl;dr / quick fix Don"t decode/encode willy nilly Don"t assume your strings are UTF-8 encoded Try to convert strings to Unicode strings as soon as possible in your code Fix your locale: How to solve UnicodeDecodeError in Python 3.6? Don"t be tempted to use quick reload hacks Unicode Zen in Python 2.x - The Long Version Without seeing the source it"s difficult to know the root cause, so I"ll have to speak generally. UnicodeDecodeError: "ascii" codec can"t decode byte generally happens when you try to convert a Python 2.x str that contains non-ASCII to a Unicode string without specifying the encoding of the original string. In brief, Unicode strings are an entirely separate type of Python string that does not contain any encoding. They only hold Unicode point codes and therefore can hold any Unicode point from across the entire spectrum. Strings contain encoded text, beit UTF-8, UTF-16, ISO-8895-1, GBK, Big5 etc. Strings are decoded to Unicode and Unicodes are encoded to strings. Files and text data are always transferred in encoded strings. The Markdown module authors probably use unicode() (where the exception is thrown) as a quality gate to the rest of the code - it will convert ASCII or re-wrap existing Unicodes strings to a new Unicode string. The Markdown authors can"t know the encoding of the incoming string so will rely on you to decode strings to Unicode strings before passing to Markdown. Unicode strings can be declared in your code using the u prefix to strings. E.g. >>> my_u = u"my √ºnic√¥d√© strƒØng" >>> type(my_u) <type "unicode"> Unicode strings may also come from file, databases and network modules. When this happens, you don"t need to worry about the encoding. Gotchas Conversion from str to Unicode can happen even when you don"t explicitly call unicode(). The following scenarios cause UnicodeDecodeError exceptions: # Explicit conversion without encoding unicode("‚Ç¨") # New style format string into Unicode string # Python will try to convert value string to Unicode first u"The currency is: {}".format("‚Ç¨") # Old style format string into Unicode string # Python will try to convert value string to Unicode first u"The currency is: %s" % "‚Ç¨" # Append string to Unicode # Python will try to convert string to Unicode first u"The currency is: " + "‚Ç¨" Examples In the following diagram, you can see how the word caf√© has been encoded in either "UTF-8" or "Cp1252" encoding depending on the terminal type. In both examples, caf is just regular ascii. In UTF-8, √© is encoded using two bytes. In "Cp1252", √© is 0xE9 (which is also happens to be the Unicode point value (it"s no coincidence)). The correct decode() is invoked and conversion to a Python Unicode is successfull: In this diagram, decode() is called with ascii (which is the same as calling unicode() without an encoding given). As ASCII can"t contain bytes greater than 0x7F, this will throw a UnicodeDecodeError exception: The Unicode Sandwich It"s good practice to form a Unicode sandwich in your code, where you decode all incoming data to Unicode strings, work with Unicodes, then encode to strs on the way out. This saves you from worrying about the encoding of strings in the middle of your code. Input / Decode Source code If you need to bake non-ASCII into your source code, just create Unicode strings by prefixing the string with a u. E.g. u"Z√ºrich" To allow Python to decode your source code, you will need to add an encoding header to match the actual encoding of your file. For example, if your file was encoded as "UTF-8", you would use: # encoding: utf-8 This is only necessary when you have non-ASCII in your source code. Files Usually non-ASCII data is received from a file. The io module provides a TextWrapper that decodes your file on the fly, using a given encoding. You must use the correct encoding for the file - it can"t be easily guessed. For example, for a UTF-8 file: import io with io.open("my_utf8_file.txt", "r", encoding="utf-8") as my_file: my_unicode_string = my_file.read() my_unicode_string would then be suitable for passing to Markdown. If a UnicodeDecodeError from the read() line, then you"ve probably used the wrong encoding value. CSV Files The Python 2.7 CSV module does not support non-ASCII characters üò©. Help is at hand, however, with https://pypi.python.org/pypi/backports.csv. Use it like above but pass the opened file to it: from backports import csv import io with io.open("my_utf8_file.txt", "r", encoding="utf-8") as my_file: for row in csv.reader(my_file): yield row Databases Most Python database drivers can return data in Unicode, but usually require a little configuration. Always use Unicode strings for SQL queries. MySQL In the connection string add: charset="utf8", use_unicode=True E.g. >>> db = MySQLdb.connect(host="localhost", user="root", passwd="passwd", db="sandbox", use_unicode=True, charset="utf8") PostgreSQL Add: psycopg2.extensions.register_type(psycopg2.extensions.UNICODE) psycopg2.extensions.register_type(psycopg2.extensions.UNICODEARRAY) HTTP Web pages can be encoded in just about any encoding. The Content-type header should contain a charset field to hint at the encoding. The content can then be decoded manually against this value. Alternatively, Python-Requests returns Unicodes in response.text. Manually If you must decode strings manually, you can simply do my_string.decode(encoding), where encoding is the appropriate encoding. Python 2.x supported codecs are given here: Standard Encodings. Again, if you get UnicodeDecodeError then you"ve probably got the wrong encoding. The meat of the sandwich Work with Unicodes as you would normal strs. Output stdout / printing print writes through the stdout stream. Python tries to configure an encoder on stdout so that Unicodes are encoded to the console"s encoding. For example, if a Linux shell"s locale is en_GB.UTF-8, the output will be encoded to UTF-8. On Windows, you will be limited to an 8bit code page. An incorrectly configured console, such as corrupt locale, can lead to unexpected print errors. PYTHONIOENCODING environment variable can force the encoding for stdout. Files Just like input, io.open can be used to transparently convert Unicodes to encoded byte strings. Database The same configuration for reading will allow Unicodes to be written directly. Python 3 Python 3 is no more Unicode capable than Python 2.x is, however it is slightly less confused on the topic. E.g the regular str is now a Unicode string and the old str is now bytes. The default encoding is UTF-8, so if you .decode() a byte string without giving an encoding, Python 3 uses UTF-8 encoding. This probably fixes 50% of people"s Unicode problems. Further, open() operates in text mode by default, so returns decoded str (Unicode ones). The encoding is derived from your locale, which tends to be UTF-8 on Un*x systems or an 8-bit code page, such as windows-1251, on Windows boxes. Why you shouldn"t use sys.setdefaultencoding("utf8") It"s a nasty hack (there"s a reason you have to use reload) that will only mask problems and hinder your migration to Python 3.x. Understand the problem, fix the root cause and enjoy Unicode zen. See Why should we NOT use sys.setdefaultencoding("utf-8") in a py script? for further details Answer #9 The short answer, or TL;DR Basically, eval is used to evaluate a single dynamically generated Python expression, and exec is used to execute dynamically generated Python code only for its side effects. eval and exec have these two differences: eval accepts only a single expression, exec can take a code block that has Python statements: loops, try: except:, class and function/method definitions and so on. An expression in Python is whatever you can have as the value in a variable assignment: a_variable = (anything you can put within these parentheses is an expression) eval returns the value of the given expression, whereas exec ignores the return value from its code, and always returns None (in Python 2 it is a statement and cannot be used as an expression, so it really does not return anything). In versions 1.0 - 2.7, exec was a statement, because CPython needed to produce a different kind of code object for functions that used exec for its side effects inside the function. In Python 3, exec is a function; its use has no effect on the compiled bytecode of the function where it is used. Thus basically: >>> a = 5 >>> eval("37 + a") # it is an expression 42 >>> exec("37 + a") # it is an expression statement; value is ignored (None is returned) >>> exec("a = 47") # modify a global variable as a side effect >>> a 47 >>> eval("a = 47") # you cannot evaluate a statement Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> File "<string>", line 1 a = 47 ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax The compile in "exec" mode compiles any number of statements into a bytecode that implicitly always returns None, whereas in "eval" mode it compiles a single expression into bytecode that returns the value of that expression. >>> eval(compile("42", "<string>", "exec")) # code returns None >>> eval(compile("42", "<string>", "eval")) # code returns 42 42 >>> exec(compile("42", "<string>", "eval")) # code returns 42, >>> # but ignored by exec In the "eval" mode (and thus with the eval function if a string is passed in), the compile raises an exception if the source code contains statements or anything else beyond a single expression: >>> compile("for i in range(3): print(i)", "<string>", "eval") Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> File "<string>", line 1 for i in range(3): print(i) ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax Actually the statement "eval accepts only a single expression" applies only when a string (which contains Python source code) is passed to eval. Then it is internally compiled to bytecode using compile(source, "<string>", "eval") This is where the difference really comes from. If a code object (which contains Python bytecode) is passed to exec or eval, they behave identically, excepting for the fact that exec ignores the return value, still returning None always. So it is possible use eval to execute something that has statements, if you just compiled it into bytecode before instead of passing it as a string: >>> eval(compile("if 1: print("Hello")", "<string>", "exec")) Hello >>> works without problems, even though the compiled code contains statements. It still returns None, because that is the return value of the code object returned from compile. In the "eval" mode (and thus with the eval function if a string is passed in), the compile raises an exception if the source code contains statements or anything else beyond a single expression: >>> compile("for i in range(3): print(i)", "<string>". "eval") Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> File "<string>", line 1 for i in range(3): print(i) ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax The longer answer, a.k.a the gory details exec and eval The exec function (which was a statement in Python 2) is used for executing a dynamically created statement or program: >>> program = """ for i in range(3): print("Python is cool") """ >>> exec(program) Python is cool Python is cool Python is cool >>> The eval function does the same for a single expression, and returns the value of the expression: >>> a = 2 >>> my_calculation = "42 * a" >>> result = eval(my_calculation) >>> result 84 exec and eval both accept the program/expression to be run either as a str, unicode or bytes object containing source code, or as a code object which contains Python bytecode. If a str/unicode/bytes containing source code was passed to exec, it behaves equivalently to: exec(compile(source, "<string>", "exec")) and eval similarly behaves equivalent to: eval(compile(source, "<string>", "eval")) Since all expressions can be used as statements in Python (these are called the Expr nodes in the Python abstract grammar; the opposite is not true), you can always use exec if you do not need the return value. That is to say, you can use either eval("my_func(42)") or exec("my_func(42)"), the difference being that eval returns the value returned by my_func, and exec discards it: >>> def my_func(arg): ... print("Called with %d" % arg) ... return arg * 2 ... >>> exec("my_func(42)") Called with 42 >>> eval("my_func(42)") Called with 42 84 >>> Of the 2, only exec accepts source code that contains statements, like def, for, while, import, or class, the assignment statement (a.k.a a = 42), or entire programs: >>> exec("for i in range(3): print(i)") 0 1 2 >>> eval("for i in range(3): print(i)") Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> File "<string>", line 1 for i in range(3): print(i) ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax Both exec and eval accept 2 additional positional arguments - globals and locals - which are the global and local variable scopes that the code sees. These default to the globals() and locals() within the scope that called exec or eval, but any dictionary can be used for globals and any mapping for locals (including dict of course). These can be used not only to restrict/modify the variables that the code sees, but are often also used for capturing the variables that the executed code creates: >>> g = dict() >>> l = dict() >>> exec("global a; a, b = 123, 42", g, l) >>> g["a"] 123 >>> l {"b": 42} (If you display the value of the entire g, it would be much longer, because exec and eval add the built-ins module as __builtins__ to the globals automatically if it is missing). In Python 2, the official syntax for the exec statement is actually exec code in globals, locals, as in >>> exec "global a; a, b = 123, 42" in g, l However the alternate syntax exec(code, globals, locals) has always been accepted too (see below). compile The compile(source, filename, mode, flags=0, dont_inherit=False, optimize=-1) built-in can be used to speed up repeated invocations of the same code with exec or eval by compiling the source into a code object beforehand. The mode parameter controls the kind of code fragment the compile function accepts and the kind of bytecode it produces. The choices are "eval", "exec" and "single": "eval" mode expects a single expression, and will produce bytecode that when run will return the value of that expression: >>> dis.dis(compile("a + b", "<string>", "eval")) 1 0 LOAD_NAME 0 (a) 3 LOAD_NAME 1 (b) 6 BINARY_ADD 7 RETURN_VALUE "exec" accepts any kinds of python constructs from single expressions to whole modules of code, and executes them as if they were module top-level statements. The code object returns None: >>> dis.dis(compile("a + b", "<string>", "exec")) 1 0 LOAD_NAME 0 (a) 3 LOAD_NAME 1 (b) 6 BINARY_ADD 7 POP_TOP <- discard result 8 LOAD_CONST 0 (None) <- load None on stack 11 RETURN_VALUE <- return top of stack "single" is a limited form of "exec" which accepts a source code containing a single statement (or multiple statements separated by ;) if the last statement is an expression statement, the resulting bytecode also prints the repr of the value of that expression to the standard output(!). An if-elif-else chain, a loop with else, and try with its except, else and finally blocks is considered a single statement. A source fragment containing 2 top-level statements is an error for the "single", except in Python 2 there is a bug that sometimes allows multiple toplevel statements in the code; only the first is compiled; the rest are ignored: In Python 2.7.8: >>> exec(compile("a = 5 a = 6", "<string>", "single")) >>> a 5 And in Python 3.4.2: >>> exec(compile("a = 5 a = 6", "<string>", "single")) Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> File "<string>", line 1 a = 5 ^ SyntaxError: multiple statements found while compiling a single statement This is very useful for making interactive Python shells. However, the value of the expression is not returned, even if you eval the resulting code. Thus greatest distinction of exec and eval actually comes from the compile function and its modes. In addition to compiling source code to bytecode, compile supports compiling abstract syntax trees (parse trees of Python code) into code objects; and source code into abstract syntax trees (the ast.parse is written in Python and just calls compile(source, filename, mode, PyCF_ONLY_AST)); these are used for example for modifying source code on the fly, and also for dynamic code creation, as it is often easier to handle the code as a tree of nodes instead of lines of text in complex cases. While eval only allows you to evaluate a string that contains a single expression, you can eval a whole statement, or even a whole module that has been compiled into bytecode; that is, with Python 2, print is a statement, and cannot be evalled directly: >>> eval("for i in range(3): print("Python is cool")") Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> File "<string>", line 1 for i in range(3): print("Python is cool") ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax compile it with "exec" mode into a code object and you can eval it; the eval function will return None. >>> code = compile("for i in range(3): print("Python is cool")", "foo.py", "exec") >>> eval(code) Python is cool Python is cool Python is cool If one looks into eval and exec source code in CPython 3, this is very evident; they both call PyEval_EvalCode with same arguments, the only difference being that exec explicitly returns None. Syntax differences of exec between Python 2 and Python 3 One of the major differences in Python 2 is that exec is a statement and eval is a built-in function (both are built-in functions in Python 3). It is a well-known fact that the official syntax of exec in Python 2 is exec code [in globals[, locals]]. Unlike majority of the Python 2-to-3 porting guides seem to suggest, the exec statement in CPython 2 can be also used with syntax that looks exactly like the exec function invocation in Python 3. The reason is that Python 0.9.9 had the exec(code, globals, locals) built-in function! And that built-in function was replaced with exec statement somewhere before Python 1.0 release. Since it was desirable to not break backwards compatibility with Python 0.9.9, Guido van Rossum added a compatibility hack in 1993: if the code was a tuple of length 2 or 3, and globals and locals were not passed into the exec statement otherwise, the code would be interpreted as if the 2nd and 3rd element of the tuple were the globals and locals respectively. The compatibility hack was not mentioned even in Python 1.4 documentation (the earliest available version online); and thus was not known to many writers of the porting guides and tools, until it was documented again in November 2012: The first expression may also be a tuple of length 2 or 3. In this case, the optional parts must be omitted. The form exec(expr, globals) is equivalent to exec expr in globals, while the form exec(expr, globals, locals) is equivalent to exec expr in globals, locals. The tuple form of exec provides compatibility with Python 3, where exec is a function rather than a statement. Yes, in CPython 2.7 that it is handily referred to as being a forward-compatibility option (why confuse people over that there is a backward compatibility option at all), when it actually had been there for backward-compatibility for two decades. Thus while exec is a statement in Python 1 and Python 2, and a built-in function in Python 3 and Python 0.9.9, >>> exec("print(a)", globals(), {"a": 42}) 42 has had identical behaviour in possibly every widely released Python version ever; and works in Jython 2.5.2, PyPy 2.3.1 (Python 2.7.6) and IronPython 2.6.1 too (kudos to them following the undocumented behaviour of CPython closely). What you cannot do in Pythons 1.0 - 2.7 with its compatibility hack, is to store the return value of exec into a variable: Python 2.7.11+ (default, Apr 17 2016, 14:00:29) [GCC 5.3.1 20160413] on linux2 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> a = exec("print(42)") File "<stdin>", line 1 a = exec("print(42)") ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax (which wouldn"t be useful in Python 3 either, as exec always returns None), or pass a reference to exec: >>> call_later(exec, "print(42)", delay=1000) File "<stdin>", line 1 call_later(exec, "print(42)", delay=1000) ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax Which a pattern that someone might actually have used, though unlikely; Or use it in a list comprehension: >>> [exec(i) for i in ["print(42)", "print(foo)"] File "<stdin>", line 1 [exec(i) for i in ["print(42)", "print(foo)"] ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax which is abuse of list comprehensions (use a for loop instead!). Answer #10 TL;DR version: For the simple case of: I have a text column with a delimiter and I want two columns The simplest solution is: df[["A", "B"]] = df["AB"].str.split(" ", 1, expand=True) You must use expand=True if your strings have a non-uniform number of splits and you want None to replace the missing values. Notice how, in either case, the .tolist() method is not necessary. Neither is zip(). In detail: Andy Hayden"s solution is most excellent in demonstrating the power of the str.extract() method. But for a simple split over a known separator (like, splitting by dashes, or splitting by whitespace), the .str.split() method is enough1. It operates on a column (Series) of strings, and returns a column (Series) of lists: >>> import pandas as pd >>> df = pd.DataFrame({"AB": ["A1-B1", "A2-B2"]}) >>> df AB 0 A1-B1 1 A2-B2 >>> df["AB_split"] = df["AB"].str.split("-") >>> df AB AB_split 0 A1-B1 [A1, B1] 1 A2-B2 [A2, B2] 1: If you"re unsure what the first two parameters of .str.split() do, I recommend the docs for the plain Python version of the method. But how do you go from: a column containing two-element lists to: two columns, each containing the respective element of the lists? Well, we need to take a closer look at the .str attribute of a column. It"s a magical object that is used to collect methods that treat each element in a column as a string, and then apply the respective method in each element as efficient as possible: >>> upper_lower_df = pd.DataFrame({"U": ["A", "B", "C"]}) >>> upper_lower_df U 0 A 1 B 2 C >>> upper_lower_df["L"] = upper_lower_df["U"].str.lower() >>> upper_lower_df U L 0 A a 1 B b 2 C c But it also has an "indexing" interface for getting each element of a string by its index: >>> df["AB"].str[0] 0 A 1 A Name: AB, dtype: object >>> df["AB"].str[1] 0 1 1 2 Name: AB, dtype: object Of course, this indexing interface of .str doesn"t really care if each element it"s indexing is actually a string, as long as it can be indexed, so: >>> df["AB"].str.split("-", 1).str[0] 0 A1 1 A2 Name: AB, dtype: object >>> df["AB"].str.split("-", 1).str[1] 0 B1 1 B2 Name: AB, dtype: object Then, it"s a simple matter of taking advantage of the Python tuple unpacking of iterables to do >>> df["A"], df["B"] = df["AB"].str.split("-", 1).str >>> df AB AB_split A B 0 A1-B1 [A1, B1] A1 B1 1 A2-B2 [A2, B2] A2 B2 Of course, getting a DataFrame out of splitting a column of strings is so useful that the .str.split() method can do it for you with the expand=True parameter: >>> df["AB"].str.split("-", 1, expand=True) 0 1 0 A1 B1 1 A2 B2 So, another way of accomplishing what we wanted is to do: >>> df = df[["AB"]] >>> df AB 0 A1-B1 1 A2-B2 >>> df.join(df["AB"].str.split("-", 1, expand=True).rename(columns={0:"A", 1:"B"})) AB A B 0 A1-B1 A1 B1 1 A2-B2 A2 B2 The expand=True version, although longer, has a distinct advantage over the tuple unpacking method. Tuple unpacking doesn"t deal well with splits of different lengths: >>> df = pd.DataFrame({"AB": ["A1-B1", "A2-B2", "A3-B3-C3"]}) >>> df AB 0 A1-B1 1 A2-B2 2 A3-B3-C3 >>> df["A"], df["B"], df["C"] = df["AB"].str.split("-") Traceback (most recent call last): [...] ValueError: Length of values does not match length of index >>> But expand=True handles it nicely by placing None in the columns for which there aren"t enough "splits": >>> df.join( ... df["AB"].str.split("-", expand=True).rename( ... columns={0:"A", 1:"B", 2:"C"} ... ) ... ) AB A B C 0 A1-B1 A1 B1 None 1 A2-B2 A2 B2 None 2 A3-B3-C3 A3 B3 C3 ```
``` Tutorials (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Python OpenCV | cv2.putText () method numpy.arctan2 () in Python Python | os.path.realpath () method Python OpenCV | cv2.circle () method Python OpenCV | cv2.cvtColor () method Python - Move item to the end of the list time.perf_counter () function in Python Check if one list is a subset of another in Python Python | os.path.join () method Python | os.path.expanduser () method Replace negative value with zero in Numpy array Python | Convert nested dictionary list to Pandas dataframe TimeField — Django Models Python | os.path.isdir () method Python OpenCV cv2.line () method numpy.poly1d () in Python Numpy.sqrt () in Python Split nested list into two lists in Python Python program to convert camel case string to snake case Python | Pandas DataFrame.reset_index () Binning in Data Mining Python | Add suffix / prefix to strings in a list Dunn index Python Python - Print list vertically Books for developers Python Data Science Handbook 22/08/2021 CEH v11 Certified Ethical Hacker Study Guide 12/08/2021 Data Science from Scratch. First Principles with Python 23/09/2020 Python Workout: 50 TEN-MINUTE EXERCISES 23/09/2020 © 2022 Python.Engineering Best Python tutorials books for beginners and professionals Python.Engineering is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to amazon.com Python in Italiano Python auf Deutsch Python en Français Python en Español Türk dilinde Python Python: мануалы на русском ITIL v4 Computations Development Cryptography For dummies Machine Learning Big Data Loops Counters NumPy NLP PHP Regular Expressions File Handling Arrays String Variables Knowledge Database X Submit new EBook \$(document).ready(function () { \$(".modal_galery").owlCarousel({ items: 1, itemsCustom: false, itemsDesktop: [1300, 1], itemsDesktopSmall: [960, 1], itemsTablet: [768, 1], itemsTabletSmall: false, itemsMobile: [479, 1], singleItem: false, itemsScaleUp: false, pagination: false, navigation: true, rewindNav: true, autoPlay: true, stopOnHover: true, navigationText: [ "<img class='img_no_nav_mob' src='/wp-content/themes/nimani/image/prevCopy.png'>", "<img class='img_no_nav_mob' src='/wp-content/themes/nimani/image/nextCopy.png'>" ], }); \$(".tel_mask").mask("+9(999) 999-99-99"); }) ```