👻 Check our latest review to choose the best laptop for Machine Learning engineers and Deep learning tasks!
I would like to know if there is a better way to print all objects in a Python list than this :
myList = [Person("Foo"), Person("Bar")] print(" ".join(map(str, myList))) Foo Bar
I read this way is not really good :
myList = [Person("Foo"), Person("Bar")] for p in myList: print(p)
Isn"t there something like :
print(p) for p in myList
If not, my question is... why ? If we can do this kind of stuff with comprehensive lists, why not as a simple statement outside a list ?
👻 Read also: what is the best laptop for engineering students?
Pythonc way to print list items join: Questions
Why is it string.join(list) instead of list.join(string)?
This has always confused me. It seems like this would be nicer:
my_list = ["Hello", "world"] print(my_list.join("-")) # Produce: "Hello-world"
my_list = ["Hello", "world"] print("-".join(my_list)) # Produce: "Hello-world"
Is there a specific reason it is like this?
It"s because any iterable can be joined (e.g, list, tuple, dict, set), but its contents and the "joiner" must be strings.
"_".join(["welcome", "to", "stack", "overflow"]) "_".join(("welcome", "to", "stack", "overflow"))
Using something other than strings will raise the following error:
TypeError: sequence item 0: expected str instance, int found
This was discussed in the String methods... finally thread in the Python-Dev achive, and was accepted by Guido. This thread began in Jun 1999, and
str.join was included in Python 1.6 which was released in Sep 2000 (and supported Unicode). Python 2.0 (supported
str methods including
join) was released in Oct 2000.
- There were four options proposed in this thread:
joinas a built-in function
- Guido wanted to support not only
tuples, but all sequences/iterables.
seq.reduce(str)is difficult for newcomers.
seq.join(str)introduces unexpected dependency from sequences to str/unicode.
join()as a built-in function would support only specific data types. So using a built-in namespace is not good. If
join()supports many datatypes, creating an optimized implementation would be difficult, if implemented using the
__add__method then it would ve
- The separator string (
sep) should not be omitted. Explicit is better than implicit.
Here are some additional thoughts (my own, and my friend"s):
- Unicode support was coming, but it was not final. At that time UTF-8 was the most likely about to replace UCS2/4. To calculate total buffer length of UTF-8 strings it needs to know character coding rule.
- At that time, Python had already decided on a common sequence interface rule where a user could create a sequence-like (iterable) class. But Python didn"t support extending built-in types until 2.2. At that time it was difficult to provide basic
iterableclass (which is mentioned in another comment).
Guido"s decision is recorded in a historical mail, deciding on
Funny, but it does seem right! Barry, go for it...
Guido van Rossum
join() method is in the string class, instead of the list class?
I agree it looks funny.
Historical note. When I first learned Python, I expected join to be a method of a list, which would take the delimiter as an argument. Lots of people feel the same way, and there‚Äôs a story behind the join method. Prior to Python 1.6, strings didn‚Äôt have all these useful methods. There was a separate string module which contained all the string functions; each function took a string as its first argument. The functions were deemed important enough to put onto the strings themselves, which made sense for functions like lower, upper, and split. But many hard-core Python programmers objected to the new join method, arguing that it should be a method of the list instead, or that it shouldn‚Äôt move at all but simply stay a part of the old string module (which still has lots of useful stuff in it). I use the new join method exclusively, but you will see code written either way, and if it really bothers you, you can use the old string.join function instead.
--- Mark Pilgrim, Dive into Python
We hope this article has helped you to resolve the problem. Apart from Pythonc way to print list items, check other join-related topics.
By the way, this material is also available in other languages:
- Italiano Pythonc way to print list items
- Deutsch Pythonc way to print list items
- Français Pythonc way to print list items
- Español Pythonc way to print list items
- Türk Pythonc way to print list items
- Русский Pythonc way to print list items
- Português Pythonc way to print list items
- Polski Pythonc way to print list items
- Nederlandse Pythonc way to print list items
- 中文 Pythonc way to print list items
- 한국어 Pythonc way to print list items
- 日本語 Pythonc way to print list items
- हिन्दी Pythonc way to print list items
Shanghai | 2022-11-30
Maybe there are another answers? What Pythonc way to print list items exactly means?. I am just not quite sure it is the best method
Warsaw | 2022-11-30
Simply put and clear. Thank you for sharing. Pythonc way to print list items and other issues with StackOverflow was always my weak point 😁. I am just not quite sure it is the best method
California | 2022-11-30
Maybe there are another answers? What Pythonc way to print list items exactly means?. Checked yesterday, it works!